The Guardian view on changes to copyright laws: authors should be protected over big tech

## Summary
The back cover states: ‘The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies.’ Photograph: Matthew Chattle/Shutterstock View image in fullscreen The back cover states: ‘The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies.’ Photograph: Matthew Chattle/Shutterstock The Guardian view on changes to copyright laws: authors should be protected over big tech Editorial Writers are voicing their anger at AI theft of their work with ‘Human Authored’ logos and an empty book. The government must listen I n a scene that might have come from a dystopian novel, books were being stamped with “Human Authored” logos at this week’s London Book Fair. The Society of Authors described its labelling scheme as “an important sticking plaster to protect and promote human creativity in lieu of AI labelled content in the marketplace”. The back cover states: “The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies.” The message is clear: writers have had enough.

## Article Content
The back cover states: ‘The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies.’
Photograph: Matthew Chattle/Shutterstock
View image in fullscreen
The back cover states: ‘The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies.’
Photograph: Matthew Chattle/Shutterstock
The Guardian view on changes to copyright laws: authors should be protected over big tech
Editorial
Writers are voicing their anger at AI theft of their work with ‘Human Authored’ logos and an empty book. The government must listen
I
n a scene that might have come from a dystopian novel, books were being stamped with
“Human Authored” logos
at this week’s London Book Fair. The Society of Authors
described
its labelling scheme as “an important sticking plaster to protect and promote human creativity in lieu of AI labelled content in the marketplace”.
Visitors to the fair were also being given copies of
Don’t Steal This Book
, an anthology of about 10,000 writers including Nobel laureate Kazuo Ishiguro, Malorie Blackman, Jeanette Winterson and Richard Osman, in which the pages are completely blank. The back cover states: “The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies.” The message is clear: writers have had enough.
The fair comes the week before the government is due to deliver its
progress report on AI and copyright
, after proposals for a relaxation of existing laws caused outrage last year. Philippa Gregory, the novelist,
described
the plans for an “opt-out” policy, which puts the onus on writers to refuse permission for their work to be trawled, as akin to putting a sign on your front door asking burglars to pass by.
According to a
University of Cambridge study
last autumn, almost 60% of published authors believe their work has been used to train large language models without consent or reimbursement. And nearly 40% said their income had already fallen as result of generative AI or machine-made novels, a digital incarnation of Orwell’s Versificator in Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Factual books are clearly most vulnerable to ChatGPT. While sales in fiction are rising (thanks largely to the
boom in romantasy novels
),
sales of nonfiction
were down 6% last year compared with 2024, the lowest since 2014. But three nonfiction books, all by women, bucked the trend:
Nobody’s Girl
, Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir of abuse by Jeffrey Epstein;
A Hymn to Life
, Gisèle Pelicot’s account of her ordeal at the hands of her ex-husband; and
Careless People
, Sarah Wynn-Williams’s exposé of working at Facebook. The success of these first-person testimonies show the powerful reach of nonfiction beyond the world of publishing. These are painfully human stories. And readers must be able to trust in the authenticity of their voices.
Last year, Sarah Hall requested that her publisher Faber, print a “Human Written” stamp on her latest novel, Helm. “AI might mimic the words more rapidly, but … it hasn’t bled on the page,” she
said
. “And it doesn’t have a family to support.”
Writers’ livelihoods must not be sacrificed to the promise of economic growth. The UK’s creative industries
contributed £124bn
to the UK economy in 2023,
£11bn from publishing
. The Society of Authors is
requesting
consent and fair payment for use of work, and transparency as to how a book was “written”. These are hardly radical propositions. But in an era of fake news and AI slop, they are sadly necessary. Writers need more than sticking plasters. They need robust legislation.
A
House of Lords report
published last week lays out two possible futures: one in which the UK “becomes a world-leading home for responsible, legalised artificial intelligence (AI) development” and another in which it continues “to drift towards tacit acceptance of large-scale, unlicensed use of creative content”. One scenario protects UK artists, the other benefits global tech companies. To avoid a world of empty content, the choice is clear.
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our
letters
section, please
click here
.
Explore more on these topics
Publishing
Opinion
Intellectual property
AI (artificial intelligence)
editorials
Share
Reuse this content

---

## Expert Analysis

### Merits
- The back cover states: ‘The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies.’ Photograph: Matthew Chattle/Shutterstock View image in fullscreen The back cover states: ‘The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies.’ Photograph: Matthew Chattle/Shutterstock The Guardian view on changes to copyright laws: authors should be protected over big tech Editorial Writers are voicing their anger at AI theft of their work with ‘Human Authored’ logos and an empty book.
- The Society of Authors described its labelling scheme as “an important sticking plaster to protect and promote human creativity in lieu of AI labelled content in the marketplace”.
- The back cover states: “The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies.” The message is clear: writers have had enough.
- The fair comes the week before the government is due to deliver its progress report on AI and copyright , after proposals for a relaxation of existing laws caused outrage last year.

### Areas for Consideration
N/A

### Implications
- The back cover states: ‘The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies.’ Photograph: Matthew Chattle/Shutterstock View image in fullscreen The back cover states: ‘The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies.’ Photograph: Matthew Chattle/Shutterstock The Guardian view on changes to copyright laws: authors should be protected over big tech Editorial Writers are voicing their anger at AI theft of their work with ‘Human Authored’ logos and an empty book.
- The government must listen I n a scene that might have come from a dystopian novel, books were being stamped with “Human Authored” logos at this week’s London Book Fair.
- Philippa Gregory, the novelist, described the plans for an “opt-out” policy, which puts the onus on writers to refuse permission for their work to be trawled, as akin to putting a sign on your front door asking burglars to pass by.
- And nearly 40% said their income had already fallen as result of generative AI or machine-made novels, a digital incarnation of Orwell’s Versificator in Nineteen Eighty-Four.

### Expert Commentary
This article covers book, writers, government topics. Notable strengths include discussion of book. Readability: Flesch-Kincaid grade 0.0. Word count: 701.