Volume 105, Issue 6 | Law Review
Complicating Racial Justice Narratives: The Peremptory Elimination DebateDaniel S. HarawaPage 1731
Response:Racial Justice Through Peremptory ChallengesRichard Lorren JollyPage 1787
Contested CriminalizationSteven Arrigg KohPage 1799
Response:Foreign Affairs Prosecutions and CybercrimeMailyn FidlerPage 1857
Reckoning with Social Policy in Utility RegulationGabriel Chan&Alexandra B. KlassPage 1871
Response:Utilities’ Utility in an Unjust SocietyAnn M. EisenbergPage 1933
Challenging Federal Government Impunity: The Case of Disability LawMargo SchlangerPage 1949
By Any Means Necessary: Title II of the ADA as a Sword Against Police BrutalitySanketh BhaskarPage 2011
Defending Race-Based Affinity Organizations in Higher Education in a Post-SFFASocietyIvana WijedasaPage 2037
Executive Summary
The Law Review's Volume 105, Issue 6 presents a diverse range of scholarly articles and responses addressing critical issues in racial justice, criminalization, utility regulation, disability law, and higher education. The authors offer nuanced perspectives on complex problems, including the peremptory elimination debate, social policy in utility regulation, and defending race-based affinity organizations. This issue underscores the need for ongoing dialogue and examination of the intersections between law, policy, and social justice.
Key Points
- ▸ The peremptory elimination debate and its implications for racial justice
- ▸ The role of social policy in utility regulation and its impact on marginalized communities
- ▸ The application of disability law in challenging federal government impunity
Merits
Interdisciplinary Approaches
The articles demonstrate a laudable commitment to interdisciplinary approaches, incorporating insights from sociology, psychology, and philosophy to enrich legal analysis.
Demerits
Limited Empirical Data
Some articles could benefit from more extensive empirical data to support their arguments and enhance the validity of their conclusions.
Expert Commentary
This issue of the Law Review showcases the complexity and depth of contemporary legal scholarship. The authors' engagement with pressing social justice issues, such as racial justice and disability law, underscores the imperative for ongoing critical examination and reform. By exploring the intersections between law, policy, and social justice, these articles contribute meaningfully to the development of more equitable and just societies.
Recommendations
- ✓ Future research should prioritize the collection and analysis of empirical data to inform policy and legal reforms
- ✓ Policymakers and legal practitioners must engage with the insights and perspectives presented in these articles to develop more effective and just solutions to pressing social problems
