TaSR-RAG: Taxonomy-guided Structured Reasoning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
arXiv:2603.09341v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) helps large language models (LLMs) answer knowledge-intensive and time-sensitive questions by conditioning generation on external evidence. However, most RAG systems still retrieve unstructured chunks and rely on one-shot generation, which often yields redundant context, low information density, and brittle multi-hop reasoning. While structured RAG pipelines can improve grounding, they typically require costly and error-prone graph construction or impose rigid entity-centric structures that do not align with the query's reasoning chain. We propose \textsc{TaSR-RAG}, a taxonomy-guided structured reasoning framework for evidence selection. We represent both queries and documents as relational triples, and constrain entity semantics with a lightweight two-level taxonomy to balance generalization and precision. Given a complex question, \textsc{TaSR-RAG} decomposes it into an ordered sequence of triple
arXiv:2603.09341v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) helps large language models (LLMs) answer knowledge-intensive and time-sensitive questions by conditioning generation on external evidence. However, most RAG systems still retrieve unstructured chunks and rely on one-shot generation, which often yields redundant context, low information density, and brittle multi-hop reasoning. While structured RAG pipelines can improve grounding, they typically require costly and error-prone graph construction or impose rigid entity-centric structures that do not align with the query's reasoning chain. We propose \textsc{TaSR-RAG}, a taxonomy-guided structured reasoning framework for evidence selection. We represent both queries and documents as relational triples, and constrain entity semantics with a lightweight two-level taxonomy to balance generalization and precision. Given a complex question, \textsc{TaSR-RAG} decomposes it into an ordered sequence of triple sub-queries with explicit latent variables, then performs step-wise evidence selection via hybrid triple matching that combines semantic similarity over raw triples with structural consistency over typed triples. By maintaining an explicit entity binding table across steps, \textsc{TaSR-RAG} resolves intermediate variables and reduces entity conflation without explicit graph construction or exhaustive search. Experiments on multiple multi-hop question answering benchmarks show that \textsc{TaSR-RAG} consistently outperforms strong RAG and structured-RAG baselines by up to 14\%, while producing clearer evidence attribution and more faithful reasoning traces.
Executive Summary
This study introduces TaSR-RAG, a taxonomy-guided structured reasoning framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) that addresses the limitations of unstructured evidence retrieval and one-shot generation in LLMs. By decomposing complex questions into ordered sequences of triple sub-queries, TaSR-RAG enables step-wise evidence selection and explicit latent variable resolution. Experiments demonstrate significant performance improvements over strong RAG and structured-RAG baselines, along with enhanced evidence attribution and reasoning clarity. The proposed framework offers a novel approach to structured reasoning, leveraging a lightweight taxonomy to balance generalization and precision.
Key Points
- ▸ TaSR-RAG introduces a taxonomy-guided structured reasoning framework for RAG
- ▸ Taxonomy representation allows for balanced generalization and precision
- ▸ Step-wise evidence selection enables explicit latent variable resolution
Merits
Strength in addressing limitations of unstructured RAG
TaSR-RAG effectively addresses the limitations of unstructured evidence retrieval and one-shot generation in LLMs, leading to improved performance and clarity in reasoning traces.
Flexibility in handling complex queries
The framework's ability to decompose complex questions into ordered sequences of triple sub-queries enables step-wise evidence selection, making it more adaptable to diverse query types.
Efficient use of lightweight taxonomy
The implementation of a lightweight two-level taxonomy allows for balanced generalization and precision, reducing the computational overhead associated with complex graph construction.
Demerits
Potential complexity in handling high-dimensional query spaces
While the framework's step-wise evidence selection mechanism is efficient, it may become computationally expensive for high-dimensional query spaces, potentially limiting its scalability.
Dependence on query decomposition quality
The effectiveness of TaSR-RAG relies heavily on the quality of query decomposition, which may be challenging for complex or ill-defined queries, potentially introducing new sources of error.
Expert Commentary
The introduction of TaSR-RAG marks a significant advancement in the field of RAG and structured reasoning. The framework's ability to balance generalization and precision through the use of a lightweight taxonomy is particularly noteworthy. While potential limitations in scalability and query decomposition quality exist, the study's findings and proposed framework offer a promising direction for future research. The implications of TaSR-RAG are far-reaching, with potential applications in real-world scenarios and policy-related areas. As the field continues to evolve, it is essential to build upon the foundations established by this study and explore further refinements and extensions to TaSR-RAG.
Recommendations
- ✓ Future research should focus on exploring the scalability of TaSR-RAG and developing strategies to mitigate potential computational overhead.
- ✓ Investigating the use of more advanced taxonomy representations and reasoning mechanisms may further enhance the effectiveness of the framework.