Submissions - Minnesota Law Review
The Minnesota Law Review is published six times a year in November, December, February, April, May, and June by the Minnesota Law Review Foundation. Headnotes is published two times a year in the Fall and Spring. Minnesota Law Review Submissions for the Volume 111 print edition of the Minnesota Law Review are now open as of February barne102 - Minnesota Law Review
TheMinnesota Law Reviewis published six times a year in November, December, February, April, May, and June by the Minnesota Law Review Foundation.Headnotesis published two times a year in the Fall and Spring.
Headnotesaccepts submissions on a rolling basis. Submissions should be sent tomnlawrev@umn.edu. Due to the large number of submissions received, we are unable to respond to each submission. You will be contacted if your submission receives an offer of publication.
TheMinnesota Law Reviewoffers publication agreements that conform toOpen Access Law Journal principles, which give authors great freedom to distribute their works. Please reviewa copy of our model publication agreementfor further information.
Executive Summary
The Minnesota Law Review article discusses the submission guidelines for the law review and its companion publication, Headnotes. The law review is published six times a year and accepts submissions on a rolling basis. The publication agreements conform to Open Access Law Journal principles, giving authors freedom to distribute their works. Authors can submit their work to mnlawrev@umn.edu, but due to the high volume of submissions, only successful authors will be contacted. The law review's publication agreement is available for review, providing transparency and clarity for potential authors.
Key Points
- ▸ The Minnesota Law Review publishes six times a year
- ▸ Headnotes is published twice a year and accepts submissions on a rolling basis
- ▸ Publication agreements conform to Open Access Law Journal principles
Merits
Open Access Principles
The law review's adherence to Open Access Law Journal principles provides authors with greater control over their work and facilitates the dissemination of knowledge
Demerits
Lack of Response to Submissions
The law review's inability to respond to each submission may leave authors without feedback or updates on the status of their work
Expert Commentary
The Minnesota Law Review's submission guidelines and publication agreements reflect a commitment to openness and transparency in academic publishing. The law review's adherence to Open Access Law Journal principles is particularly noteworthy, as it provides authors with greater control over their work and facilitates the dissemination of knowledge. However, the law review's inability to respond to each submission may be a source of frustration for authors. Overall, the law review's guidelines and agreements strike a balance between the needs of authors and the demands of academic publishing.
Recommendations
- ✓ Authors should carefully review the law review's publication agreement before submitting their work
- ✓ The law review should consider implementing a system for providing feedback or updates to authors on the status of their submissions
