DIVERSITY & INCLUSION
TheBoston University Law Reviewis deeply committed to diversity in its membership and scholarship. Diversity is not limited to a list of identities, but we recognize how varied life stories create values and perspectives that are not traditionally highlighted in legal scholarship and academia.
Historically, marginalized voices have been stifled, and law reviews have not until recently begun to prioritize amplifying these voices. We acknowledge this imbalance and strive to ensure theBoston University Law Review’s staff is diverse and reflective of our student body. Our scholarship is strengthened by the unique insights every member contributes to the editorial process. Moreover, a diverse editorial staff enhances our membership experience by ensuring our collaboration reflects varied experiences.
To that end, theBoston University Law Reviewhas taken the following steps to improve diversity amongst membership over the years:
We know this is not sufficient, which is why we continue to work with the law school administration to make the writing competition as equitable as possible. We aspire to see this list of efforts increase annually as we continue to promote diverse voices.
Executive Summary
The Boston University Law Review has demonstrated a commitment to diversity and inclusion by acknowledging the historical imbalance in marginalized voices and taking steps to promote diverse voices. The law review has implemented measures to improve diversity amongst membership, including working with the law school administration to make the writing competition more equitable. Despite these efforts, the law review recognizes that more work is needed to achieve true diversity and inclusion.
Key Points
- ▸ Commitment to diversity and inclusion
- ▸ Acknowledgement of historical imbalance in marginalized voices
- ▸ Implementation of measures to improve diversity amongst membership
Merits
Proactive Approach
The law review's proactive approach to addressing diversity and inclusion is a significant strength, demonstrating a willingness to acknowledge and address historical imbalances.
Demerits
Insufficient Progress
The law review's acknowledgement that its current efforts are insufficient highlights a limitation, suggesting that more needs to be done to achieve true diversity and inclusion.
Expert Commentary
The Boston University Law Review's commitment to diversity and inclusion is a laudable step towards addressing the historical imbalance in marginalized voices. However, the law review's acknowledgement of insufficient progress highlights the need for ongoing efforts to address systemic barriers and promote true diversity and inclusion. As the law review continues to work towards this goal, it is essential to consider the broader implications of its efforts, including the potential impact on the legal profession and society as a whole.
Recommendations
- ✓ Continued collaboration with the law school administration to address systemic barriers
- ✓ Regular assessment and evaluation of diversity and inclusion efforts to ensure progress and identify areas for improvement
