DIGITAL DIPLOMACY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: REGULATION ASPECTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
The article examines the legal aspects of regulating artificial intelligence in the context of digital diplomacy. The author examines the process of transformation of traditional diplomatic institutions under the influence of digitalization and the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies, analyzes existing international legal mechanisms and their applicability to new diplomatic practices. Special attention is paid to the problems of legal responsibility, data sovereignty, transparency of algorithms, and attribution in digital diplomacy. Research is based on a set of scientific methods and approaches that ensure the complete study of the object of research. Thanks to the formal-legal method, the legal status of diplomatic artificial intelligence systems within the framework of current international law has been determined. A comparative legal approach was used to compare national and regional strategies for regulating AI in international relations. The historical-legal appr
The article examines the legal aspects of regulating artificial intelligence in the context of digital diplomacy. The author examines the process of transformation of traditional diplomatic institutions under the influence of digitalization and the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies, analyzes existing international legal mechanisms and their applicability to new diplomatic practices. Special attention is paid to the problems of legal responsibility, data sovereignty, transparency of algorithms, and attribution in digital diplomacy. Research is based on a set of scientific methods and approaches that ensure the complete study of the object of research. Thanks to the formal-legal method, the legal status of diplomatic artificial intelligence systems within the framework of current international law has been determined. A comparative legal approach was used to compare national and regional strategies for regulating AI in international relations. The historical-legal approach was used to study the development of diplomatic law and its adaptation to new technologies. Based on the analysis of national and international regulatory legal acts, judicial practice, and doctrinal sources, a conceptual model for multi-level regulation of artificial intelligence in diplomatic activities is proposed. The need to create specialized legal regimes for various categories of diplomatic artificial intelligence systems, taking into account their functional characteristics and potential risks, is substantiated.
Executive Summary
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the regulation of artificial intelligence in digital diplomacy, examining the implications of AI on traditional diplomatic institutions and the need for specialized legal regimes. The author employs a multi-disciplinary approach, combining formal-legal, comparative legal, and historical-legal methods to study the development of diplomatic law and its adaptation to AI. The research highlights the importance of addressing issues such as legal responsibility, data sovereignty, transparency of algorithms, and attribution in digital diplomacy. A conceptual model for multi-level regulation of AI in diplomatic activities is proposed, emphasizing the need for tailored legal regimes for various categories of AI systems. The article contributes to the ongoing debate on regulating AI in international relations, providing a valuable framework for policymakers and scholars.
Key Points
- ▸ The article highlights the transformation of traditional diplomatic institutions under digitalization and the introduction of AI technologies.
- ▸ It examines existing international legal mechanisms and their applicability to new diplomatic practices.
- ▸ The author proposes a conceptual model for multi-level regulation of AI in diplomatic activities.
Merits
Comprehensive Approach
The article employs a multi-disciplinary approach, combining formal-legal, comparative legal, and historical-legal methods to provide a comprehensive analysis of the regulation of AI in digital diplomacy.
Conceptual Model
The proposed conceptual model for multi-level regulation of AI in diplomatic activities is a valuable contribution to the ongoing debate on regulating AI in international relations.
Implications for Policy
The article highlights the importance of addressing issues such as legal responsibility, data sovereignty, transparency of algorithms, and attribution in digital diplomacy, providing practical implications for policymakers.
Demerits
Limited Scope
The article primarily focuses on digital diplomacy and AI, with limited consideration of other areas where AI may be applied, such as trade or finance.
Complexity of AI Regulation
The complexity of regulating AI in international relations is a significant challenge, and the article may oversimplify the process or overlook key considerations.
Expert Commentary
The article makes a significant contribution to the ongoing debate on regulating AI in international relations, providing a comprehensive analysis of the regulation of AI in digital diplomacy. The proposed conceptual model for multi-level regulation of AI in diplomatic activities is a valuable framework for policymakers to develop tailored legal regimes for various categories of AI systems. However, the article may benefit from a more nuanced consideration of the complexity of AI regulation and the potential limitations of its proposed approach. Nevertheless, the article is a valuable addition to the literature on AI and international relations, providing insights into the development of digital diplomacy and the need for specialized legal regimes for various categories of AI systems.
Recommendations
- ✓ Future research should consider the implications of AI on other areas of international law, such as trade or finance, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the regulation of AI in international relations.
- ✓ Policymakers and scholars should engage in ongoing dialogue to develop tailored legal regimes for various categories of AI systems, addressing the complexity of AI regulation and the potential limitations of existing approaches.
Sources
Original: CrossRef
